Insights & Guidance on Workplace Learning & Development and CPD | WorkplaceHero

What Truly Outstanding Looks Like: An Insider's Perspective

Written by Graham M | Jun 27, 2025 12:24:31 PM

When people ask me what Outstanding really looks like, I sometimes want to say, "Well, it looks a lot like us."

And by "us," I don’t just mean one individual or even one department, I mean the whole ecosystem. The learners, the tutors, the support staff, the governance team, the operations crew, the data systems quietly doing their job in the background. It’s never one person. It's never one perfect moment. It's a pattern of consistency, honesty, and learning that runs right through the heart of a provider.

I’ve now been through multiple Ofsted inspections, including leading a full inspection where we were graded Outstanding across all areas, with no areas for improvement. That still takes my breath away. But more than the grade, it was the process that changed me.

So here’s what I want to share: what truly Outstanding looks like, not as a checklist, but as a culture.

1. Outstanding doesn’t feel flashy. It feels calm.

There’s a perception that Outstanding providers are bursting with innovation, doing ten new things a month, throwing buzzwords at every problem. The reality? Our inspection week felt... calm. There were no last-minute scrambles. No big presentations. Just people doing what they always do, well.

We weren’t trying to impress. We were trying to show up, consistently, and with clarity. Inspectors can feel the difference.

2. The SAR and QIP aren’t paperwork. They’re pulse checks.

We used our Self-Assessment Report (SAR) not to sell ourselves but to tell the truth. What are we proud of? What’s still on the to-do list? Where have we made a difference? Our SAR didn’t hide imperfections. It connected them to action.

That’s where the QIP came in. It wasn’t a document that lived in a folder. It lived in our meetings, our check-ins, our planning. It was used, updated, questioned. It helped us track impact - not just intent. And during inspection, that showed.

3. Staff weren’t prepped. They were prepared.

We didn’t do a single “what to say to Ofsted” session. Not one. What we did do was invest in our staff’s confidence long before the call. We talked about curriculum intent and how to explain it. We reviewed learner voice data and shared outcomes. We built up a shared language.

So when inspectors spoke to staff, they didn’t get a script. They got a conversation. That’s when you know the culture is right.

4. Learners are your loudest evidence.

No matter how well you write a policy or explain a process, it’s your learners who show what’s working. We spent time understanding their experience, from onboarding to exit. We ran learner voice surveys, listened carefully, and took visible action.

So when learners spoke to inspectors, they didn’t have to perform. They just shared what they already knew: that they were safe, supported, and learning what they needed to succeed.

5. Safeguarding wasn’t separate. It was woven in.

Safeguarding wasn’t a standalone topic. It was threaded into everything, from the curriculum, to staff CPD, to learner support. Our bi-annual safeguarding reviews helped us spot themes, act quickly, and ensure our processes weren’t just compliant - they were working.

By the time Ofsted asked questions, we didn’t have to go digging. We had a clear picture already.

6. Leaders had oversight - but not control.

Outstanding leadership isn’t about having all the answers. It’s about building systems that bring the answers to you.

We had regular curriculum check-ins, deep dives, governance reviews, and data cycles, but they weren’t there to catch people out. They were there to support, to ask questions, to close loops.

Inspectors noted that leaders had "forensic oversight", but that oversight was built on trust, not surveillance. That matters.

7. It’s not about perfection. It’s about evidence of progress.

Not everything was perfect. Some areas were bedding in. Some actions were mid-cycle. But we could show why we’d made certain decisions, what we’d done so far, and what the early signs of impact were.

Inspectors aren’t looking for perfection. They’re looking for intentional improvement. We had that. And we could talk about it without panic.

8. Governance was active, not reactive.

Our external governance partner had been part of our improvement journey for months—not just the week before inspection. He had oversight, challenge, and insight. Our Board knew the SAR before it was signed off. They understood our risks, our plans, our strengths.

That meant we didn’t have to script anything. The governance conversation was real, not rehearsed.

9. Data wasn’t just numbers. It told a story.

Attendance. Progression. Completion. Retention. Learner feedback. Tutor feedback. We didn’t just collect data, we used it.

We spotted gaps and addressed them. We celebrated improvements. We mapped CPD to need. So when data came up in inspection, we didn’t offer spreadsheets, we offered narrative.

10. Outstanding doesn’t happen to a provider. It’s built by everyone.

No single person gets Outstanding. You build it together.

And when it happens, when you hear those words - it’s not about fireworks. It’s about a quiet, proud moment of recognition. That what you believed about your team, your learners, your culture… was seen. And validated.

If you’re a quality lead, a nominee, or just someone quietly holding it all together behind the scenes: keep going. Outstanding isn’t a label. It’s a lived reality. It takes a lot of hard work and persistence, but I promise, it is worth it. 
 

And it might already be happening in your classrooms and workshops - you just need to help the world see it.