In my recent post about the IQA role, I talked about how too many Internal Quality Assurers focus almost entirely on assessment — with little or no reference to teaching and learning.

It struck a nerve.
Some IQAs were nodding along in agreement. Others got defensive.
And that reaction told me one thing:
This is a conversation we need to keep having.

Because yes, sampling, evidence and compliance are non-negotiable.
But if our definition of quality stops there, we’re missing the point — and missing opportunities to improve outcomes for students.

Why IQA Models Matter

The most effective IQAs I’ve worked with have one thing in common:
They have a shared language with tutors and assessors.
They don’t just tick criteria; they ask questions like:

• How did the teaching sequence set this learner up for success?

• Were they actively engaged in the session?

• Does the assessment evidence reflect deep understanding, not just task completion?

Having a simple, shared model makes those conversations easier — and keeps everyone aligned.

So here are four practical IQA models you can take away today. You can adopt one, adapt one, or combine them to suit your organisation.

1. LENS Model – Look Through the Right Lens

L – Learning intent is clear and purposeful
E – Engagement is high and inclusive
N – Needs of all students are met (differentiation/support)
S – Standards are met in both delivery and assessment

Why it works:
LENS is about perspective. When IQAs look beyond paperwork to see the whole learner experience, quality conversations naturally become more balanced. Tutors can also self-assess using the same lens.

2. TEA Model – Teaching, Engagement, Assessment

T – Teaching: Is the content pitched right and delivered effectively?
E – Engagement: Are students active, motivated, and participating?
A – Assessment: Is evidence valid, reliable, and linked to learning?

Why it works:
It’s short, memorable, and easy to embed in day-to-day QA activity. Plus, “brewing good TEA” is a simple way to remind staff of the balance between teaching quality and assessment rigour.

3. SPARK Model – Ignite Better Learning

S – Sequencing of learning and assessment is logical
P – Participation is active and inclusive
A – Application of knowledge/skills is evident
R – Relevance to curriculum intent is clear
K – Knowledge & skills are accurately assessed

Why it works:
SPARK is about energy and forward motion. It reminds IQAs to focus on how delivery and assessment light up the learner journey — not just record its completion.

4. CLEAR Model – Clarity in Quality

C – Curriculum intent is understood and applied
L – Learning experience is engaging and inclusive
E – Evidence meets awarding body standards
A – Assessment supports learning, not just measurement
R – Reflection and feedback drive improvement

Why it works:
CLEAR puts compliance and quality on the same page. It’s especially useful for aligning observation notes, IQA reports, and improvement plans into a single, transparent framework.

Choosing the Right Model

All four models are:

• Short and easy to remember

• Designed to bridge teaching and assessment

• Suitable for IQAs, tutors, and quality leads to use together

If you already have a strong QA culture, a model like SPARK might give it fresh energy.
If your focus has been heavily compliance-driven, TEA or LENS might help rebalance the conversation.

The model matters less than the mindset.
And the mindset is this:
IQA should be part of the CPD conversation, not just the compliance one.

Next steps for your organisation:

• Pick a model and introduce it in your next IQA meeting.

• Use it in observations and sampling feedback.

• Invite tutors to self-assess against it before IQA reviews.

When IQAs and tutors speak the same quality language, we don’t just meet standards — we raise them.