WorkplaceHero
Talent and succession£10 inc. VAT

High-potential readiness 360

Add evidence to succession discussions and separate confidence, ambition and visibility from readiness for broader responsibility.

Questions
12
Reviewer time
About 5 mins
Typical cadence
Before a talent review, succession decision or stretch assignment

What this assessment is for

Potential decisions can reward confidence or similarity to existing leaders. A shared set of observable signals gives talent panels a fairer, more useful basis for a stretch decision.

A multi-rater view of learning agility, judgement, influence and readiness for broader responsibility.

Who does what

Who is assessed

A person being considered for stretch or succession.

Who answers

They rate themselves, then managers, peers and stakeholders who have seen them under stretch add evidence.

Best used when

Before a talent review, stretch assignment or succession decision.

Reviewers: Self, manager, peers and stakeholders who have seen them in stretch situations.

What it measures

12 statements across 3 themes, each rated on a 1 to 5 scale.

Learning agility

Learns from unfamiliar work and adapts quickly.

Influence and judgement

Builds trust, sees the wider system and makes sound calls.

Stretch readiness

Has the resilience, ambition and self-awareness for broader responsibility.

Sample questions
  • Gets to useful performance quickly when the work is unfamiliar.
  • Applies lessons from one situation to a different problem.
  • Volunteers for work that expands their capability, not just their visibility.
  • Changes approach when evidence shows the current one is not working.
  • Considers consequences beyond their own team or immediate target.
  • Builds support through credibility and reasoning rather than authority alone.

A sample of the 12 statements included.

Inside your report

What you get when the responses are in

  • Learning agility and judgement themes
  • Self versus stakeholder gaps
  • Readiness signals and development risks
  • Targeted stretch actions

When to run it

  • Before a succession or talent review
  • Choosing a stretch assignment
  • Supporting an emerging-leader programme
Business case

The business case, in three numbers

Everything you need to justify the spend to a finance lead.

Assessment cost
£10

Including VAT, per assessment.

Typical cost avoided
£10,000+

Typical cost of a poor stretch or promotion decision

Break-even
Better evidence before one promotion can outweigh hundreds of assessments.
  • Potential is more reliable when judged across situations and observers.
  • Learning agility and judgement are distinct from current-role performance.
  • The report supports, rather than replaces, a fair talent process.

Figures are published UK benchmarks (CIPD, HSE and recruitment cost surveys) and are indicative, not a guarantee of savings in your organisation.

How it works

1. Set it up and pay

Create the cycle, pay £10 including VAT, or use 2 credits if your organisation holds a credit wallet.

2. People tap a link

Everyone you invite gets a unique magic link. No account, no password, works on a phone.

3. Read the report

Scores, gaps and comments are assembled as responses come in, ready to take into the conversation.

Frequently asked questions

Does this decide who should be promoted?

No. It adds structured evidence to a wider decision that should also consider results, role requirements, aspiration and opportunity.

Who should respond?

The person, their manager, peers and stakeholders who have seen them handle unfamiliar or stretching work.

Is colleague feedback anonymous?

Peer feedback is grouped. Managers are shown as a named reviewer group, and very small groups are merged to reduce identification risk.

Other workplace assessments

Ready to run it?

Set up the cycle, invite the people you want to hear from and get your report.£10 including VAT, or through your organisation's credit wallet.